Certified Legal Professional (CLP) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Study for the Certified Legal Professional (CLP) Exam. Explore flashcards and multiple choice questions with detailed explanations. Prepare effectively for your legal certification!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Is the attorney subject to discipline for representing the environmental group against the hog farming company?

  1. No, because the representation of the local environmental group is not adverse to the attorney's former employer

  2. Yes, because the attorney failed to notify the EPA

  3. No, because the attorney did not represent the hog farmers

  4. Yes, because the action constituted the same matter as the previous lawsuit

The correct answer is: Yes, because the action constituted the same matter as the previous lawsuit

The reasoning behind the belief that the attorney is subject to discipline for representing the environmental group against the hog farming company centers around the principle of conflicts of interest and the duty to maintain loyalty to former clients. When an attorney represents a new client in a matter that is substantially related to a previous representation, there can be issues related to confidentiality and the potential for using information gained from the former client to the detriment of that client. In this scenario, if the action taken by the environmental group constitutes the same matter as the previous lawsuit involving the attorney's former employer, the attorney may be considered to be representing interests that are adverse to those of the former employer. This could violate ethical rules that prohibit attorneys from representing new clients in matters that are substantially related to prior representations without the informed consent of the former client. Thus, the outcome is that the attorney could indeed face disciplinary action for this representation, as it implicates both ethical considerations and the potential misuse of confidential information obtained during their prior representation. It's important to understand how the context of previous client relationships can impact an attorney's ethical obligations in future cases.